Unlike the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fight against Ripple Labs, U.S. Judge Sarah Netburn instructed both parties to hold a “discovery call meeting on Tuesday, April 6, 2021.” The judge’s order instructed the parties to discuss the coercive motion proposed by Ruibo Law Firm.

Forced exercise

On March 15, attorneys representing Brad Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen, the current CEOs of Ripple Laboratories, asked Judge Netburn to force the SEC to show that they were A document filed by a fintech company.

Ripple’s lawyer argued in the motion that it was necessary to seek a court order because the regulator refused to produce the required documents. Specifically, the lawyer claimed that the SEC did not provide “a single document on Bitcoin or Ethereum-two virtual currencies that are very similar to XRP.”

In addition, the lawyer also claimed in the motion that the SEC did not provide internal documents related to the legal status of XRP. The lawyers are also seeking “any documents from 10 of the 19 custodians proposed by the defendant.”

XRP Army Reaction

At the same time, in accordance with the judge’s order, some Ripple supporters on Twitter praised the judge’s decision, which they believed would help the fintech company’s case. For example, a Twitter user called Kingslayer wrote:

This will be a huge step, because the internal communications of SEC News will eventually be exposed. April 6th will be a day worth looking forward to. It may become clear.

Another CNF user asked: “Am I the only one who feels that both Ripple and the SEC have a good view of the destructiveness of these documents? There are no restrictions on the number of guidance and advice for more than 8 years of posts that have been spread by multiple parties. Consistent regulatory policy.”

See also  The Securities and Exchange Commission of Nigeria and the Central Bank of Nigeria hold talks on cryptocurrency regulations-2020 cryptocurrency guidelines remain suspended-Bitcoin News Regulations

At the same time, the order also requires members of the public who are interested in hearing the discovery meeting to dial in a number that “will be distributed to all parties before the meeting.”

What is your opinion on this court order? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Picture Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The company or the author shall not bear any direct or indirect responsibility for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article or related thereto.