The Reserve of India (RBI), the central bank of India, has officially notified the bank that its banking ban is no longer valid because the ban was revoked by the Supreme Court of India more than a year ago. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, banks have been citing the Reserve Bank of India’s notice when handling cryptocurrencies.

The Reserve of India asks banks to stop citing its “no longer valid” circular on cryptocurrencies

The Reserve of India (RBI), the central bank of India, issued a notice on Monday to clarify its position on cryptocurrencies. The notice is titled “Customer Due Diligence for Virtual Currency Transactions” and aims to “target all commercial and cooperative banks, payment banks, small financial banks, NBFCs and payment system providers.”

The Reserve of India wrote:

Media reports have drawn our attention. Certain banks/regulated entities have warned their customers not to conduct virtual currency transactions by referring to the Reserve of India circular on April 6, 2018.

The April circular informs banks that they are prohibited from conducting cryptocurrency transactions. However, the Supreme Court of India cancelled the circular in March last year, allowing banks to resume providing services for crypto businesses (including cryptocurrency exchanges).

The Reserve of India clarified in its notice on Monday: “Such references to the above circular by banks/regulated entities are unreasonable because this circular is a hon’ble Supreme Court petition on March 4, 2020. (Civil Law, No. 528 of 2018 (Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India), which elaborates:

Therefore, according to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the notice is no longer valid from the date of the Supreme Court’s decision, so it cannot be cited or cited.

The central added: “However, banks and other entities mentioned above may continue to conduct customer due diligence procedures in accordance with Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, in addition to ensuring compliance with the Foreign Exchange Administration Act (FEMA) In addition to the relevant regulations on overseas remittances, it is also based on the “Prevention of Money Laundering Act” (PMLA) of 2002 to combat terrorist financing (CFT) and the obligations of regulated entities.”

See also  Goldman Sachs uses crypto management company Galaxy Digital to exchange Bitcoin futures

Although restrictions were lifted in March last year, it is reported that some banks in India are still restricting crypto transactions. According to reports, some customers have received warning emails from their banks stating that they are not allowed to use bank accounts or credit cards for encrypted transactions.

Some media even reported that the Reserve of India informally asked the bank to cut ties with crypto businesses and traders. However, the National Payment Corporation of India stated that it will not prohibit cryptocurrency transactions through UPI.

At the same time, the Indian government is still working on cryptocurrency regulation. An encryption bill should have been proposed at the parliamentary budget meeting, but this is not the case. Last month, the media reported that the government plans to set up a panel of experts to study cryptocurrency regulation.

What do you think of the clarification made by the Reserve of India to the bank regarding cryptocurrency? Let us know in the comments section below.

Tags in this story

Bank ban, bank bitcoin, bank cryptocurrency, no ban on bitcoin, no ban on encryption, no ban on cryptocurrency, India, Central Bank of India, Reserve Bank of India, rbi ban, rbi circular, rbi no ban

Picture Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer, nor is it a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or company. does not provide investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The company or the author shall not bear any direct or indirect responsibility for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by using or relying on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article or related thereto.